Let’s break them down…
The iPhone 7 (left) and iPhone 6 (right) show how little the iPhone has changed externally in three generations. Image credit: Apple |
It’s easy to mix up these three phones with a quick glance as they all use the same core design Apple introduced with the iPhone 6 in 2014:
- iPhone 6 – 138.1 x 67 x 6.9 mm (5.44 x 2.64 x 0.27 in) and 129 g (4.55 oz)
- iPhone 6S – 138.3 x 67.1 x 7.1 mm (5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 in) and 143 g (5.04 oz)
- iPhone 7 – 138.3 x 67.1 x 7.1 mm (5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 in) and 138 g (4.87 oz)
The iPhone 6 uses Series 6000 aluminium, which is prone to bending, but this is fixed by the iPhone 6S which uses much stronger Series 7000 aluminium. Meanwhile the iPhone 7 retains this stronger chassis while adding water resistance (allow 30 minutes full submersion at depths of up to one metre) and a fixed home button with haptic (vibration) feedback which eliminates an infamous point of failure.
The iPhone 7 has a new ‘Taptic’ (haptic) home button. Image credit: Apple |
But you also pay a price with the iPhone 7 as Apple has ‘courageously’ removed the headphone jack. If you use wireless headphones this won’t matter, but if you prefer wired you will need adapters and you can’t listen to music and charge your phone at the same time. Apple says its removal allowed it to add water resistance, but Samsung achieved this while keeping the jack (at least for now).
iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus both remove the headphone jack so the Lightning port has to be used for everything. Image credit: Apple |
Read more – iPhone 7 Vs Galaxy S7 Review: Should You Upgrade?
Displays – Still LCD, But Improving
Apple’s inability to source OLED panels in large enough quantities for its iPhone range has long given rivals a welcome advantage (which may soon end). As such on paper the iPhones’ screens look rather pathetic, but there is more to these raw specifications than meets the eye:
- iPhone 6, iPhone 6S and iPhone 7 – 4.7-inch LED-backlit IPS LCD, 1334 x 750 pixels (326 ppi), 65.6% screen-to-body ratio
Both iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus displays are bright, vivid and very color accurate pushing LCD to its limits. Image credit: Gordon Kelly |
Performance – Apple Keeps Breaking Records
It isn’t even a competition now. Every year the new iPhone easily outstrips its rivals in both synthetic benchmarks and real world usage (though the Google Pixel comes very close in the latter), but Apple keeps setting new records:
- iPhone 6 – Apple A8 chipset: Dual-core CPU, Quad core GPU, 1GB of RAM
- iPhone 6S – Apple A9 chipset: Dual-core CPU, GPU: Six Core GPU, 2GB of RAM
- iPhone 7 – Apple A10 Fusion chipset: Quad Core CPU, Six Core GPU, 2GB of RAM
The A10 Fusion chipset makes the iPhone 7 Apple’s fastest ever iPhones and the fastest smartphone currently available. Image credit: Apple |
Lastly the iPhone 6S introduced a second generation Touch ID fingerprint sensor which is twice as fast and accurate as the iPhone 6, but it is unchanged in the iPhone 7.
Cameras – Advancement But No Longer Class Leading
While Apple continues to extend its performance advantage year-in-year out against rivals, the improvements made to its cameras have been more incremental to the extent that the iPhone has been overtaken by both the Galaxy S7 and Google Pixel.
The iPhone 7 camera (bottom) has improved, but is no longer best in class. Image credit: Gordon Kelly |
- iPhone 6 – Rear: 8 megapixel sensor, f2.4 aperture, Focus Pixels, EIS, dual-LED flash, 4K video recording. Front: 1.2MP Front Camera, f2.4 aperture, 720p video recording
- iPhone 6S – Rear: 12 megapixel sensor, f2.2 aperture, Focus Pixels, Software Image Stabilisation, dual-LED flash, 4K video recording. Front: 5MP Front Camera, f2.2 aperture, 720p video recording
- iPhone 7 – Rear: 12 megapixel sensor, f/1.8 aperture, Focus Pixels, Optical Image Stabilisation, quad-LED (dual tone) flash, 4K video recording. Front: 7MP sensor, f/2.2 aperture, 1080p recording
Right now the Google Pixel is clearly the best smartphone camera with the Galaxy S7 second with the 4.7-inch iPhone 7 falling behind. Image credit: Gordon Kelly |
Composite photo – in isolation the iPhone 7 (left) and iPhone 7 Plus (middle) look good, but the Galaxy S7 (right) brings an extra level of clarity and detail in low light. Image credit: Gordon Kelly |
Battery Life And Charging – Still Disappointing, Still Slow
Want to know an area where Apple has made next to no improvements over the last three iPhone generations? Battery life. While the Plus models remain stamina kings, the 4.7-inch models fall way behind both them and iPhone rivals with minimal capacity changes:
- iPhone 6 – 1810 mAh
- iPhone 6S – 1715 mAh
- iPhone 7 – 1960 mAh
iPhone 7 Vs iPhone 7 Plus battery life shows a clear win for the larger iPhone as the 4.7-inch model stagnates. Image credit: Gordon Kelly |
In short: if battery life is a priority stick to the iPhone Plus models or look at Google’s Pixel XL.
Storage And Price – Goodbye 16GB Nightmares
Credit to Apple here, after years of sticking to the loathsome 16GB entry level tier it doubled storage for both the iPhone 7 and (retrospectively) the iPhone 6S:
- iPhone 6 – 16GB, 64GB, 128GB prices
- iPhone 6S – 16GB, 32GB, 64GB and 128GB prices – no 256GB option available
- iPhone 7 – 32GB, 128GB and 256GB prices
That said I think the Plus models are easily the best iPhones these days.
Picking between the iPhone 7 (left) and iPhone 6S (right) is perhaps harder than it should be. Image credit: Apple |
A quick glance between the iPhone 6, iPhone 6S and iPhone 7 would suggest Apple has been standing still for the last three generations, but there have been consistent – if not mindblowing – improvements each year. Given their price differences, choosing between the iPhone 6S and iPhone 7 is more difficult than it should be but the iPhone 6 is a model that is now starting to show its age...
Source: Forbes
0 Response to "iPhone 7 Vs iPhone 6S Vs iPhone 6: What's The Difference?"
Post a Comment
Dont Spam in My Blog😊